Context
Budgets are tight and scrutinised, and spending on digital competes directly with programme delivery. Volunteers and part-time staff often maintain the site, so anything requiring specialist upkeep degrades. Service users may arrive in difficulty, on older devices and limited connections, which makes performance and accessibility a service issue rather than a technical preference. Funders assess governance and evidence, and increasingly expect both to be visible before they engage.
Non-Profit, from problem to plan
The opportunity
Constrained budgets make the disciplined choices unusually valuable here. A small number of well-built pages that serve both audiences properly outperforms a large site nobody maintains.
Named in the sector's own vocabulary, because a generic list would tell you nothing about whether we understand your business.
Mapped to a problem on the left, not offered because it is on our service list.
Answers01
Answers01
Answers02
Answers02
Answers03
Answers03
Technology
Named with the reason it is on the list. Each links to the page stating where we would use it and where we would not.
Recommended journey
Usually with the constraint that is capping everything else, rather than with the most visible symptom.
Service delivery first, then evidence for funders, then fundraising conversion. That order reflects the mission and, in practice, the funder evidence tends to improve fundraising anyway.
Public sector bodies face specific obligations and others face general duties not to discriminate. Beyond the legal position, an organisation serving people with disabilities has an obvious reason to make its own service usable.
Non-profits serve two audiences whose needs conflict: funders and donors who need evidence of impact, and service users who need help without navigating a fundraising site to find it.
Budgets are tight and scrutinised, and spending on digital competes directly with programme delivery. Volunteers and part-time staff often maintain the site, so anything requiring specialist upkeep degrades. Service users may arrive in difficulty, on older devices and limited connections, which makes performance and accessibility a service issue rather than a technical preference. Funders assess governance and evidence, and increasingly expect both to be visible before they engage.
Constrained budgets make the disciplined choices unusually valuable here. A small number of well-built pages that serve both audiences properly outperforms a large site nobody maintains.
Fundraising material dominates while the people the organisation exists to help have to navigate around it to find support.
A site requiring technical skill to update decays as soon as the volunteer or agency that built it moves on, and the cost of the rebuild recurs every few years.
For an organisation whose users may have disabilities, limited devices or poor connections, an inaccessible site excludes exactly the people it was built for.
Connected
Other sectors
We publish a sector page only where we can name that sector's real problems in its own vocabulary. These are the rest of them.
Bring the constraint as you see it. We will tell you whether it is the one we would attack first, what we would need to look at to be sure, and whether this is work we should be doing at all.