Methodology
We deliver software in increments that reach production, with your team owning the code and infrastructure from the first commit. Handover is a condition of the engagement rather than a phase at the end of it.
Methodology
Scope starts narrow deliberately.
The smallest version that replaces a real part of the current process, in production, teaches more about the requirements than any specification written before anyone has used something. Large up-front specifications are the most reliable predictor of building the wrong thing.
Code lives in your repositories and infrastructure in your accounts from the beginning. Ownership arranged at the end of a project is ownership negotiated at the worst possible moment, and it is a commercial position rather than a technical necessity.
Testing and review are part of delivery, not a later phase. Automated tests around the behaviour that matters and review on every change are what make the second year of a system affordable, which is where most of its total cost actually sits.
Documentation is written for someone who was not there. The test we apply is whether a developer who joins afterwards can run the system locally, understand the decisions and deploy a change without asking us.
We deliver software in increments that reach production, with your team owning the code and infrastructure from the first commit. Handover is a condition of the engagement rather than a phase at the end of it.
Everything above is how we say we work. Thirty minutes on a real problem is the fastest way to find out whether it is also how we behave — and it costs you nothing to check.
